Help IslamDunk with your generous contribution.

The haters are growing in numbers, Islam is being attacked every day by people working full time (as Shamoun claims). We as Muslims need to work even harder to let people know the truth of Islam. To do that we need your help. We need your contribution to this project. Donate towards our work and support our cause. Use the Donate Tab on your right hand side in the home window.

Teeth Breaking Responses To Those Who Want To Extinguish The Light Of Allah

TTT is our brother/sister site that deals with writing articles responding to the most common attacks on Islam. The articles are unarguable and most scholastic (in the English language) following a unique traditional style, giving explanations of scholars, expositions of commentaries and most important of all in a simple short and clear way that everyone can understand.

Help Us Spread The Message

In order to reach as many people as possible IslamDunk needs your help. Almost everyone has a facebook account, an email list or other social connections on the web. All you need to do is use one of our logos or post a link or post our articles and videos, favor them, rate them and keep doing that over and over. This work that we are doing needs to reach every corner of the Earth so that everyone will know the truth of Islam

Shamoun's Lowly Character

Sam thinks he can beat everyone in a debate and that he has already done so. Things have not even happened yet he can predict with certainty outcomes. He thinks no one can answer him. Check out a list of answers right here.

Thursday, December 30, 2010

Walid Shoebat Proves his Extremism on ABNSat

Walid Shoebat shows his extremist core

On a Christian missionary satellite TV show (ABN) Walid Shoebat revealed his desire to nuke (nuclear bomb) Muslims. I was lost for words. Here we have a Christian fundamentalist who bangs on about “Islam is violent” yet he wants to eradicate Muslims from the face of the earth. Self projection on the part of Walid?

Walid Shoebat on ABN Sat reveals his extreme hatred (2 minute video)



I was surprised the host, Samar Gorial, never rebuked him for such a comment. In fact they carried on merrily with the rest of their show – "Jihad Exposed" – yes, that’s what they named the show. I guess the only “Jihad” they exposed was Walid Shoebat’s nuclear “Jihad”.

Perhaps the director of the station, Bassim Gorial, would like to rebuke the extreme comments

Muslims should be balanced

We as Muslims should be mindful of Islamophobia but always maintain fairness and distinguish between the moderate Christians and the extremists. NOT all Christians want to butcher us – in fact MOST would OPPOSE Walid Shoebat’s views. Walid’s views are certainly not compatible with the teachings of Muhammad or Jesus (pbut).

Quite where this radical Christian acquired such views is beyond us. I sensed Walid is cut off from a path constructive path and has fallen onto a destructive path. I invite Walid Shoebat to Islam so he can adopt a constructive path in which he is at peace with his Creator.

May Allah protect and guide us all. Ameen.

The Simples Declaration of Peace by Jibreelk

Islam has the solution
It has been quite a frequent endeavor of missionaries and social humanists who have set their minds on misrepresenting Islam in front of the masses, to accuse Islam of being a intolerant and violent religion. With their attractive media propaganda they captivated the minds of the common folk who are innocent and ignorant and have build a social camp in the western world that is driven by islamophobia. Muslims however, still claim and try with all their might to preach to the world that Islam is peaceful and has a brighter and purer face as opposed to the foxy representation given by bigots.
This article will prove beyond any doubt that the foundation of Islam lies in peace and opposing oppression of any kind.
Peace is a human aspiration that is at the core of every society. It is just like love, it is in no need of textual proofs or lip service. It is a default. If bigots were careful and honest enough to read the Quran and the other Islamic sources they would have found themselves drowning in the deep ocean of passages calling to peace, opposing oppression and upholding human rights. But they are not.
In order to prove them wrong we will use only one hadith or saying of prophet Muhammad peace be upon him, on this topic, who's simple yet comprehensive/deep speech (jamiul qualm) is an attestation of his prophethood.
Narrated Anas: Allah's Apostle said, "Help your brother, whether he is an oppressor or he is an oppressed one. People asked, "O Allah's Apostle! It is all right to help him if he is oppressed, but how should we help him if he is an oppressor?" The Prophet said, "By preventing him from oppressing others." Sahih Bukhari: Volume 3, Book 43, Number 624.
If the world powers were to lead according to this simple principle the world would be a better place. They say ignorance is bliss, however I differ when the whole world seems to be filled with people who posses such traits and use them against Islam. I wonder how do such people feel when all their televisions shows, their fancy computer effects, their so called scholars and guest speakers on Islam feel when they are refuted by a simple statement such as the hadith narrated above. Help your brother be him the oppressed or the oppressor. Let us look a bit deeper at this statement for I believe this statement does not only show Islam's peaceful aspirations on a universal scale but at the same time it shows the principle which would drive an Islamic state (which people fear so much) were it ever to happen.
The Muslim has a faith based duty to help those who are oppressed. He/she is held to the letter of the text, sinning and susceptible to hell fire if he/she suffers from the bystander effect. The Muslim is an active instrument, a model citizen who will not only care about the well being of his circle, but also of the circle of those around him. Allah says in the Quran that oppression is worst than murder. If a Muslim sees it he/she has to stop it. If there was an Islamic state, this would be the one principle that would protect all those who would be under the rule of Islam. Be them Muslims, Christians, Jews or others, no one would have to fear oppression. Yet when speaking to such people they swear that it is only the violent and oppressive nature of Islam that drives their agenda to destroy the image of the faith. Nothing else. They claim they are sincere advisors and spreaders of peace. Really? So then we must have appeased their minds with this simple hadith. The reality is that such people only want to protect their ability to sin freely and to spread their hatred for others under the pretext of love.
Such people might scream loud when reading such a hadith and say that such a statement only applies to Muslims, and that non Muslims would be oppressed, as the prophet pbuh only said help your brother, but again such people are hasty in their thinking and are short to realize that the meaning is so specific and so deep that it covers every type of living thing. Even more it holds the Muslim in a position of responsibility as if he is the oppressor he has to be stopped by none other than the Muslim. If the Muslim is the oppressor, the oppressed can be anything and anyone, and if the Muslim is the oppressed the same goes. However we need to focus on the second statement and scream it loudly, for if the Muslim is the oppressor and he is oppressing a Christian, a Jew, a Hindu, a dog, a cat, a resource, a position, the environment anything you can think of, he or she has to be stopped by non other than their own brother and sister. In the context of an Islamic state, before a non Muslim subject would even harbor thoughts of rising against the system (if oppressed by it), the Muslim would have changed the tables towards the non Muslim and would have helped him or her.
So remember: next time someone tries to inflate your head with anti Islamic lies of violence and oppression, know that the Muslim is the solution for a better, peaceful, free of oppression world.

What every Christian needs to know about the Quran - James White

Article written by Yahya Snow

It seems as though it is silly season all over again

Dr James White is planning to write a book on Islam and he has already got the title in mind. Given White’s history of blunder and dishonesty with regards to Islam, can we really expect something other than a blunder-filled missionary tome?

A Scholarly Book on ISLAM by Dr James White?

As one commentator asked, can we really trust James White to give a truthful book about Islam? His answer said it all – “never in a million years”.

Now, folk who are unfamiliar with James White will be thinking why in the world is he so untrustworthy. Well, White has a history of blundering about Islam. Once called out for such blunders he either (dishonestly) maintains he is correct or remains silent and never corrects the blunder. Yep, White KNOWINGLY leaves his readers/viewers misinformed. How difficult is it to edit a video or an online article and correct it? Not difficult at all for those who have a regard for accuracy – White is lacking in this regard!

Dr James White has NOT READ the books he requires!!!

I don’t know whether to laugh or cry. Our James has NOT EVEN READ the books he plans to use for the writing of his book. Does that make sense? He has planned the title and the objectives, but has not read the books he will use. Odd.

You may be thinking "how do you know he has not read the books"? Well, he has not even purchased the books. In fact, he is asking people off the internet to purchase them for him!

Are you jerking our chain?

I’m serious. He wants YOU to buy him the books he will use to help write his book. Perhaps he will share the profits with us!

James White under the heading “Here's How You Can Help” writes “Human nature being what it is, there is a downside to my going into "book mode." It's pretty simple: we are a small ministry. We do not have fund raisers….”

“…. I use the Ministry Resource List to obtain the materials I need for these projects, and I have put a number of such resources on that list just recently, one of which is mighty expensive, but it would be incredibly helpful”

I popped over to his ministry resource list. There are six books he is wanting (I believe at least five are for this book). I have presented a screenshot and I have noticed one of them is yet to be released.





Profit sharing? Standard procedure? I don’t know!

He has decided the title and aims of the book without having read the relevant Islamic material. Is this standard procedure? I don’t know - it seems odd.

Is White simply going to quote mine from these books or is he actually going to read and understand them? If he actually studies them then surely it will be extremely difficult for him to write TWO books (one is unrelated to Islam) and READ and DIGEST all six books he wants us to purchase for him within a year (whilst travelling to London and Ireland as well as maintaining the podcasts). What type of standard of work are we expecting here? A concoction of internet polemics and quotes mined from books he has not digested? I don’t know.

Moreover if we purchase him these books will he share the profits and what will he do with the books after their use? I don’t know. [See the comment section for the full quote and decide for yourselves]

Dishonesty and inconsistency – history of James White

James White used a fabrication (from a CHRISTIAN missionary hit piece) and attributed the source to a MUSLIM scholarly work. Furthermore, James White has never acknowledged where he got the fabrication from – nor has he acknowledged the erroneous nature of the fabrication he used. How difficult is it to admit he (unknowingly) used a fabrication thinking it was a legitimate source? Not difficult at all to those who value intellectual honesty and accuracy.

I have personally rebuked him from this very blog. I rebuked him for using a “made up” translation of a Quranic Verse – YES, he decided against using a recognised translation from the NUMEROUS out there and used one made up by his pal (a chap who makes his own up to convince people Islam allows BESTIALITY!!!) - Just made up and totally fallacious!

Once called out for this our James White, to his audience, maintained he was correct by linking to the MADE UP (and proven wrong) translation by his pal. Dishonest, inconsistent and sad – how difficult would it have been to have a regard for accuracy and admitting the blunder and abjuring oneself? Not difficult at all. Note White has STILL NOT bothered correcting himself:
http://thefactsaboutislam.blogspot.com/2010/09/muslims-rebuke-dr-james-white.html

Furthermore, White was rebuked to linking to an article which carried ANOTHER made up translation – White labelled this as “excellent Quranic insights”. This highlights his utter lack of regard for truth and consistency. He has STILL NOT BOTHERED to correct the error:

Being mindful this is turning out to be a lengthier post than I would like I will try to truncate it and allow you, the reader, to research White’s blunders and dishonest episodes for yourselves.

Did James White lie in the Greg Stafford debate – he is accused of such

Did James White use deception in the Robert Price debate – he is accused of such

White maintains more disrespectful and misleading material - knowingly

Dr White ...Insufficient and unfounded arguments

NOTE: the reason why White has never acknowledged (nor corrected) the above blunders are due to his pride and his desire to appear reliable and learned regarding Islam. Sadly, many Christian evangelists want to present themselves as learned in Islam despite being incompetent in such a subject. Just look at the sad example of the now shamed Ergun Caner.

In my opinion, James White appears to be angling for a teaching job vis-à-vis Islam in Christian apologetics classes. White is terribly blunder-prone and intellectually dishonest. These classes would be better served by bringing in folk who have a regard for consistency, accuracy and integrity.

Unchristian behaviour plus dishonest and unruly friends/colleagues

Firstly, let’s start with James White. White and his colleague have been caught on RADIO insulting Russian and Mormon (Brigham Young’s wives) women based on appearance. They have even gained years of “entertainment” in doing so. White has never apologized for this outrageous bout of audio:
http://thefactsaboutislam.blogspot.com/2010/12/james-white-lewd-ridicule-of-mormon-and.html

Sam Shamoun – this is James’ teacher and close friend. Sam Shamoun is the most shamed of Christian apologists – even more so than Ergun Caner. Sam Shamoun, in 2008 presented the thighing hoax as fact despite it being made up by Arab Christians on the net – perhaps these were Sam’s colleagues and/or friends. We don’t know as Sam Shamoun has gone all silent on us

Moreover, Sam has put James in hot water as James has been borrowing from Sam. Sadly, this borrowing meant James wound up using MADE UP AND ERRONEOUS Quranic translations – White was absolutely oblivious to it, which just further impugns White’s scholarship. Shamoun presents low level lies such as “Islam allows sex with animal”. The moral of the story – choose HONEST friends.

NOTE: James White has been invited to rebuke and disassociate himself from Sam Shamoun’s unruly and uncouth behaviour. White declined. I guess that’s integrity and consistency for you. White rebukes the easy target (Ergun Caner) but the one closer to home get’s away with insult and lies.

White seems to be covering and protecting Shamoun. I guess it is a close relationship. Perhaps Shamoun is helping with the book - What Every Christian Needs to Know about the Qur'an – by James White

Here is Sam Shamoun abusing Muslims and Islam:
http://thefactsaboutislam.blogspot.com/2010/11/sam-shamoun-obsessed-with-shabir-ally.html

Walid Shoebat – though James White has gone on record denouncing old Walid, James is colleagues with such a man. Why has he not told his employers as to Shoebat’s misleading and erroneous ways? I guess with the opportunity to appear on the box and advance your career all levels of consistency and integrity go out of the window.

David Wood – Aside from claiming he was arrested because of “Sharia” and other dishonest outrages he has presented a sex hoax whilst claiming it to be a fact, this is the SAME hoax his friend Shamoun presented two years earlier. How sad.

Kamal Saleem – This is another “ex-terrorist” colleague of James White. This one makes up his own Ahadith literature. Yes, he fabricates hadith amongst other lies and blunders.

Nabeel Qureshi – he knowingly uses fallacious translations of Ahadith literature. He has STILL not come clean and corrected himself. A sad indictment of James White’s inability is White’s featuring of Nabeel Qureshi’s dishonest work – White is STILL featuring such misleading work!

Pastor Joseph – this is James White’s friend and colleague on ABN. He presents lies such as Islam allows homosexuality amongst other outrages.

The old adage “A man is on the path of his friend” is quite telling and impugning.

Conclusion

James White is out of his league. The only relationship he should be having with a book concerning Islamic matters is that of a reader not as a writer. Sadly, the hunt for kudos and a few extra dollars is quite a self-deluding tool.

Our advice to James is to clean up his act and spend time studying, correcting his previous blunders and double checking his previous work - even Catholics (Catholicism is an area James knows much better than Islam) are calling him out on past inconsistencies and blunders. Time better served, James.

Senior Muslim scholars are wary of TV shows which put scholars in a position to give edicts via phone-in shows. The reason behind the warning is to guard against error. Contrast this prudency with James White’s recklessness - he is writing a book despite being unqualified and error-prone.

We shall not recommend his book to anyone. Obviously, some Muslim apologists may purchase it in order to sift for errors but those who are interested in learning should be mindful where you take your education from. Here is a suggestion to his followers, rather than relying on the unreliable why not sift through material yourself and do your OWN research. Just a suggestion…

Thus knowledge constitutes your deen (religion), so be wary of whom you take your religion from – Ibn Sirin [Ibn Hibban credited this statement to other scholars too]

PS If you have any errors or bouts of dishonesty you would like to highlight related to James White you can always leave a comment or drop an email.

Feedback: yahyasnow@hotmail.com

Monday, December 27, 2010

How to answer allegations?

by Waqar Akbar Cheema

exert from Let Me Turn The Tables Blogspot
Crusades, as they say, may have ended centuries ago but the crusading spirit is alive still. Innumerable polemics written against Islam and slanders against the Holy Prophet (pbuh) and the Holy Quran are a practical manifestation of the same.

Muslims have been putting in their efforts to launch an academic Jihad against this spirit. But in these times when the World Wide Web paradigm has exposed the innocent minds to this ever rising crusading onslaught there is a necessity to arm and enable each one of the Muslims to take up this challenge. In the following lines I give certain points that will, Insha’Allah, help you understand the roots of the lies against Islam and, if a little effort is put in, enable you to expose them.

Following reasons explain as to how certain people are able to make allegations against Islam and why naïve Muslims are taken off-guard. I am confident that if a person has adequate knowledge, he can easily make a rebuttal to all the slanders against our Noble Faith considering the following points. So, here you go;

1- Taking a single Ayah or a Hadith in isolation from the rest of Islamic rubric (rest of the Quran and other Ahadith).

2- Isolating an Ayah or a Hadith from its context.

3- Ignoring the fact that not all Ahadith are authentic; infact some are termed as weak and some even as fabrication by Muhaddithin (Masters of the Sciences of Hadith).

4- Extensive use of the traditions from history books like those of Al-Tabari, Ibn Ishaaq and Ibn Sa’ad etc which contain raw material about early Muslims and include numerous unauthentic narrations. Infact their compilers didn’t take the amount of care as is done in Hadith compilations. (Scholars did their best either not to narrate unauthentic narrations or to mention their weakness when they dealt with narrations of legal and juristic importance but not so with those merely of historical import).

5- Disregard to the fact that not all the narrations that may have connected chains of trustworthy narrators serve as evidence. One needs to take into account what other narrators relate about the same issue and compare with different narrations before making an inference or deduction.

6- Indifference to the delicacies and subtleties of the Arabic language. A single word or phrase may have quite different meanings in different contexts.

7- Not understanding the peculiar environment and culture of 7th A.C. Arabia especially when it comes to the life of the Holy Prophet (pbuh) and his companions.

8- Ignoring the fact that’s it’s the Arabic text of the Quran and Ahadith that matters and not the translations and commentaries.

9- ‘Overlooking’ the fact that when it comes to explanation and commentary, no single or a certain group of scholars is an absolute authority in the House of Islam. Opinion of any scholar, however erudite, may be rejected or ignored subject to valid reasons.

10- Referring to the deeds of ordinary Muslims and putting the blame on Islam. Such an attitude is absolutely wrong. Only the deeds of the Holy Prophet (PBUH), understood in the right context, represent the Islamic Faith. What if we see the Christian religion in light of the doings of the likes of Hitler?

These are the polemic tactics, assessing each of their arguments against these points will lead us to answer them in a profound manner.

Hope all this will be helpful!

INDEED ALLAH KNOWS THE BEST!!

Sunday, December 26, 2010

The change produced by the Qur'an

Saturday, December 25, 2010

Islamophobes are Confusing People

That's the sound of inevitability

It is inevitable disingenuous Islamophobes are indeed going to give rise to a load of misconceptions. Sadly, Samar Gorial of ABN Sat was absolutely oblivious to rulings concerning Jizya despite having a bunch of “experts” as her colleagues. Why is this? Her colleagues consist of some of the most obnoxiously deceptive folk I have had the misfortune of encountering.

As an individual who investigates Christian outreaches to Muslims I can honestly say the outrage which I have witnessed from Samar Gorial’s colleagues and those who support the enterprise is even more debauched than Robert Morey’s fabrication of Ahadith literature.

Samar Gorial was devoid of any sound understanding of Jizyah as her primary teachers are agenda driven - an agenda which is demonization of Muslims. Thank God Muslims are on hand to clear away the bag of tricks, gags and heckles her colleagues of used for obfuscation purposes.

Why did Samar Gorial not know this?

Tuesday, December 21, 2010

David Wood VS Christian scholars.

Monday, December 13, 2010

Collapsing: Walid Shoebat’s Deceptions...

A renewed focus on Walid Shoebat ensures his eschatological lies are put to bed as well as a revisiting of old ground our Walid meets with deadly silence

Putting Walid’s eschatological lies (and the rest) in the dumpster

Walid Shoebat’s web of deceit is unravelling. His “evangelical eschatological” charades and money making schemes are being exposed by folk who are interested in the truth.

Before presenting Mr Ayamen’s video highlighting the outright deceptions Walid Shoebat is peddling to fundamentalist Christians I will present other insight which impugns Walid Shoebat further

Walid Shoebat’s uncle exposes him…

According to Walid’s uncle Walid did NOT have a religious upbringing! Furthermore his uncle did not recall much about Walid as his mother kept her distance and he moved to America at the age of 16. Is it possible our Walid was raised a Christian by his mother? Yes!

The plot thickens

I have also received word about Walid’s surname, “Shoebat”, being a name used by Christians in Jordan and the origination of such a name is Palestine. Who is to know? This further highlights the doubt engulfing Walid Shoebat.

Was Walid Shoebat ever a Muslim, never mind a “terrorist”? Care to explain, Walid…

What about the Jerusalem Post and Walid's phantom “bomb” claim?

You just cannot get caught with anymore red on your hands!

Christians, this literally speels out D E C E P T I O N. Even a 10 year old can sniff this one out.
Our Walid claims to have bombed a bank but the bank has no record of it! Fishy stuff indeed:

Shoebat's claim to have bombed Bank Leumi in Bethlehem is rejected by members of his family who still live in the area, and Bank Leumi says it has no record of such an attack ever taking place” [http://www.jpost.com/Home/Article.aspx?id=96502]

Hmmm, who are you going to believe; the bank or a dubious, money-hungry Christian fundamentalist? The choice is simple. It’s not Walid.

Walid Shoebat - Ex-Terrorist exposed (By Ayamen1)

Mr Ayamen exposes Walid Shoebat’s “ex terrorist” persona as dubious and his fabrications about Muslim beliefs



Walid Shoebat’s age does not back his “ex terrorist” charade

As Mr Ayamen pointed out Walid’s age does no lend weight to his cooked up story:

Academic professors and others “complain they [Shoebat and his buddies] are too old to have been recruited for Islamic terror as teenagers since the ideology of Islamic jihad attacks "only became prevalent in the late 1980s, and the men are all middle age” [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walid_Shoebat]

O Christians, wake up to this fraudster!

Walid Shoebat is caught fabricating Hadith literature

Mr Ayamen does an excellent job in debunking the bread and butter lies our Walid has been peddling to Christian audiences; yes, I’m talking about his claims that Muslims are supporters of the antichrist and that the Mahdi is an “antichrist” – the usual fabrications gullible fundamentalist Christian audiences salivate over.

The reality is (as seen in the video) Shoebat is making stuff up – he is LYING. Our Walid really knows how to milk those Christians for cash and adoration!

Annual turnover of $500,000 - Walid's business!

Yep, that’s Walid’s company (Top Executive Media). Who said crime (lying) never paid? Our Walid has barrel loads of cash but is barren of class.

Further reading:

Shoebat’s bogus Mark of the Beast claim

Walid Shoebat’s son

Invitation to Islam

Christians, are you tired of being deceived and taken for a ride by your co-religionists? Would you like to learn about Islam without paying a dishonest money-hungry Christian? If yes please look into Islam. This site is very useful, so please browse through the pages at your leisure. Here is another site which is dedicated to presenting Islam to those whom are unfamiliar with Islam:
http://www.ediscoverislam.com/

Friday, December 10, 2010

Video: Imam Attacked on Subway Train (CAIR-NY)

Friday, December 3, 2010

Lecture on Moses, Jesus and Muhammad (pbut)

Fascinating and Entertaining

A fascinating lecture by Ali Ataie – entertaining to boot. It does help transcend a surface level (or erroneous) understanding on the part of those who are unaware of Islam as well as those who are its detractors. For the Muslim the lecture will be beneficial in contextualising Islam in the Abrahamic tradition.

Lecture entitled: Moses, Jesus, Muhammad: One Message

Is "Ahmad" in Surah As-Saff Prophet Muhammad?

Yes, of course!

Yes, of course Ahmad refers to Muhammad. Ahmad is “the second name of Prophet Muhammad and it (Ahmad) literally means “one who praises Allah more than others” [Hilali-Khan, Interpretation of the meanings of the Noble Quran, Darussalam, 1999, pg 728]

A Christian missionary TV show has been speaking on a Verse of the Quran (Surah 61:6) and the suggestion Ahmad is not Muhammad has been made. Quite why Christian missionaries speak upon topics they have little/no understanding is beyond us and just further discredits their operations and repute. Here is the Verse:

وَإِذۡ قَالَ عِيسَى ٱبۡنُ مَرۡيَمَ يَـٰبَنِىٓ إِسۡرَٲٓءِيلَ إِنِّى رَسُولُ ٱللَّهِ إِلَيۡكُم مُّصَدِّقً۬ا لِّمَا بَيۡنَ يَدَىَّ مِنَ ٱلتَّوۡرَٮٰةِ وَمُبَشِّرَۢا بِرَسُولٍ۬ يَأۡتِى مِنۢ بَعۡدِى ٱسۡمُهُ ۥۤ أَحۡمَدُ‌ۖ فَلَمَّا جَآءَهُم بِٱلۡبَيِّنَـٰتِ قَالُواْ هَـٰذَا سِحۡرٌ۬ مُّبِينٌ۬

And (remember) when 'Īsā (Jesus), son of Maryam (Mary), said: "O Children of Israel! I am the Messenger of Allâh unto you confirming the Taurât [(Torah) which came] before me, and giving glad tidings of a Messenger to come after me, whose name shall be Ahmed. But when he (Ahmed i.e. Muhammad SAW) came to them with clear proofs, they said: "This is plain magic." [Dr Mohsin translation Surah 61:6, from Quran explorer]

The verse mentions ٱسۡمُهُ ۥۤ أَحۡمَد (his name is Ahmad). So the Verse is using the name “Ahmad” not “Muhammad”. Ahmad is the superlative form of Muhammad and furthermore the holy Prophet, as narrated in an authentic Hadith, had five names; one of which was “Ahmad”:

Narrated Jubair bin Mut’im: Allah’s Messenger (saw) said, “I have five names: I am Muhammad and Ahmad; I am al Mahi through whom Allah will eliminate Al Kufr (infidelity); I am Al Hashir who will be the first to be resurrected, the people resurrected thereafter; and I am also Al Aqib (ie there will be no Prophet after me) [Sahih al Bukhari, 4/3532 (O.P 732)]

Don't be fooled

I will tell you this Hadith is presented in the Hilali-Khan translation of the Quran as a footnote to S61:6, thus it is not difficult for the Christian missionaries to research it for themselves rather than wasting our time and confusing Muslims and Non-Muslims with their misguided conjecture. May Allah guide them. Ameen.

PS: Somebody on the show was also claiming Jesus “sends” Ahmad. This is incorrect. The Verse (in this regard) teaches Jesus is simply informing people of the good news that ANOTHER Messenger is to come. Allah (God) is the One who sends Prophets!

May Allah send His peace and blessings on all his Messengers. Ameen.

Sunday, November 28, 2010

How I came to Islam, with Ibn Abbas

Ibn Abbas was a break dancer, a heavy drinker and a drug addict, and the only thing that saved him from a life of clutches, was Islam.


Saturday, November 27, 2010

Islamophobes and Jizyah: The Truth

Being misinformed over the Jizya

I have been watching a Chaldean Christian Satellite station (ABN Sat) and they have been prattling on about the Jizya as though it is the most obnoxious and evil thing on the planet. These Islamophobes will pull the wool over the eyes of their own folk in order to present Islam as a scary monster.

The fact remains, there is nothing wrong with the Jizya and it has been explained many times over. This post will bring you a presentation from Imam Shabir Ally (Let the Quran speak)on the Jizya. I have also presented the basics which EVERY Muslim and Non-Muslim should be aware of in order NOT to be misdirected by the “Christian” Islamophobes at ABN and other organisations who make it their business to politically scaremonger against Islam and Muslims

Researching Jizya and the Bible's support of such?

For those willing to further their research, I will furnish you a link to Jonathon’s site which covers the Jizya and features links to more extensive coverage from Bassam Zawadi. See below the video.

Bullied by the Islamophobe’s negative spin?

The Jizya is NOTHING to worry over despite all the theatrics from the Islamophobes. The Islamophobes try to bully and manipulate audiences via spin and preying on gaps in the audience’s knowledge – effectively capitalising on the vulnerable as opportunists.

Firstly, before playing Imam Shabir Ally’s presentation on the Jizya (with regards to S9:29) we should realise the Jizya is not discriminatory and is simply a poll tax which non-Muslims pay in the stead of the religious tax which is imposed upon Muslims (zakat).

Imam Shabir Ally explains Surah 9:29 – Jizya



Is the Jizya so scary? No.

The Jizya is an extremely agreeable poll tax. The Jizya is ALWAYS whatever amount both parties agree upon if the amount ever exceeds the set minimum. Now is that so scary? No.

The minimum non-Muslim poll tax is one dinar (n: 4.235 grams of gold) per person (A:per year). The maximum is whatever both sides agree upon.
It is collected with leniency and politeness as are all debts and is not levied on women, children, or the insane. [o11.4 Reliance of the Traveller, Ahmad ibn Naqib al Misri, edited and translated by Nuh Ha Mim Keller, Amana Publications, 1994]

Christians should NEVER argue against the Jizya: Mark 12:17

“Christian” Islamophobes are throwing their Bible under the bus in order to jump on the anti-Muslim bandwagon. The fact remains NO true Christian would be opposed to the Jizya.

Christians are instructed to give unto Caesar what belongs to him (see Mark 12:17), thus paying the Jizya is hardly an issue for a Bible-believing Christian. If an Islamic government taxes a Christian the Christian should not grumble. Quite why the Christians at ABN are jumping up and down is beyond me as they pay GREATER taxes to the US government which spends its tax revenues on illicit (ANTI CHRISTIAN) actions.

I guess the stench of Islamophobia is blinding too.

More information on why true Christians should not be arguing against the Jizya

Jonathon has a whole post regarding the Bible’s instructions towards Jizya (the post contains further details on Jizya and features links to more extensive information vis-à-vis the Jizya):
http://www.acommonword.net/2010/11/bible-commands-christians-to-pay-jizyah.html

Don’t be fooled or bullied by detractors who work assiduously to demonize Muslims.

Wednesday, November 24, 2010

Islamdunk_First show.mov

Alhamdulilah the first show is out. Islamdunktv has published their fist show. We ask you to forgive us for any mistakes, as it was the first show, so we hope to hear your feedback.
Please make duaa for us to improve and serve better.


Deaf man regains hearing during pilgrimage target=

Deaf man regains hearing during pilgrimage target=

A Somali man Identified as Shareef had lost his ability to hear and speak after a bomb explosion in his conflict-battered African country, he regained his hearing sense while on Hajj (Muslim annual pilgrimage).
He was hit by a bomb during internal clashes in Somalia over 20 years ago and decided later to immigrate to Britain after he could no longer hear or speak.

Doctors in Britain examined him but found that his condition is incurable, prompting authorities to let him stay as a “deaf-mute” refugee. Shareef, in his 40s, has been living in Britain with his wife and four children ever since, adding that he came to Saudi Arabia along with the Somali-British Hajj mission to perform Hajj.

After going around the Ka'aba in the grand mosque at Makkah along with the other pilgrims, he drank Zamzam (sacred) water and went to the bathroom, when he got out of the bathroom, he heard the call for Fajr (morning) prayers. “He could hardly believe what he heard…he rushed to his friends and told them what happened…they were shocked when they heard him talking.”

The head of the Somali-British Haj (pilgrimage) mission, Abdul Samad Mohammed said he was stunned when he heard him speak. “Shareef had been deaf mute for a long time…during our flight to Saudi Arabia, he was writing what he wanted from the cabin crew,” Mohammed said. “At first we could not believe it….so we asked him to speak again and he did… we took him to the hospital here for examination and doctors said there is nothing wrong with him.”



Apart from many Arabic newspapers, this story was reported on the front page of Gulf News and on the following sites:
http://www.saudigazette.com.sa/index.cfm?method=home.regcon&contentID=2010111787515
http://www.emirates247.com/news/region/deaf-man-regains-hearing-during-pilgrimage-2010-11-16-1.318039

Friday, November 19, 2010

A road to Hajj - China - 24 Nov 09 - Pt 1



This is a must see.... Make sure you also check out the other parts once you view this video on youtube. There are Road to Hajj Panama, Azerbaijan, and many other countries. I have really enjoyed seeing this series.

Thursday, November 18, 2010

Amazing Bible Facts by Dr Jerald Dirks

Biblical Insight From Dr Jerad Dirks

Muslims believe in the ORIGINAL Scriptures but the ORIGNIAL scriptures (in their entirety) have been lost, hence the need for the Quran (God’s final Revelation to mankind)



NOTES from Dr Jerald Dirks’ lecture (plus additions from Dennis Bratcher, ChristianAnswers, Bruce Metzger, BibleResearcher)

We are not speaking about translations (ie KJV, NRSV etc). Christianity has never agreed upon what constitutes the Bible.

Are Christians agreed on what constitutes the Old Testament? No!

OT Protestant Bible is 39 books whilst the Roman Catholics add a number of books to this as well as additions to the book of Daniel and the book of Esther. Greek Orthodox add EVEN MORE than the Roman Catholics; they have a 151st Psalm rather than ending with 150. They have additions to the book of Jeremiah and add 3rd and 4th Maccabees amongst others.

The Ethiopian Orthodox Church has a canon of 46 books in their Old Testament. Thus Christianity has NEVER agreed upon what makes up the OT

Have Christians agreed upon what constitutes the New Testament?

No, never!

Protestant and Roman Catholics agree upon 27 books but the Coptic Orthodox have 29 books (adding 1st and 2nd Clement) in their New Testament! The Nestorian Church omits 5 books (including Revelation) which are found in the Catholic and Protestant 27 book NT. The Ethiopian Orthodox Church has 35 books in their New Testament (including the Shepherd of Hermes).

Did Moses author the first 5 Books of the Old Testament? (plus history of the Old Testament compilation)

We know Moses did not write all of it though this is the traditional belief of the Christians. It is a cut and paste compilation from earlier source material:

J – 950 BCE
E- 750 BCE
D- 600s BCE
P- 400-500 BCE

And they were finally put together around the year 400.

Moses (p) lived is thought to have lived within the 1600-1200 BCE range. Amazingly that is at least 250 years before the first source (J) material of the Old Testament.

The letters JEDP are a designation used by scholars to identify the component parts or sources that they understand were used to compile the first five books of the Old Testament. There have been various opinions as to whether these sources were written or oral traditions, and whether each source represents an independent strand or a stage in the development of an older source. [Dennis Bratcher: JEDP: Sources in the Pentateuch]

The Torah

Most modern Biblical scholars believe the Torah (as we have it today) to be a cut and paste compilation in Babylon. The law (Torah) was actually believed to be lost in Palestine and Ezra brought the law back to Palestine from Babylonian (around year 400 BCE).

Three parts to the OT

1. Torah (first 5 books of the OT)
2. Prophets (Nabiyim),
3. The Writings (Kethubim), Christians call this the Hagiographa (the holy writings)

The Roman Catholic Church, in order to construct their OT went to the Septuagint – thus automatically accepted EVERYTHING that was in there.

Protestants used the Hebrew text rather than the Greek Septuagint and thus ended up with a shorter OT (as the Jews at the time of writing the Septuagint had not decided what constitutes the OT)

In many cases we don’t know who authored parts of the OT (e.g. Deuteronomy, 1Kings, 2Kings). We DON’T know who authored all the books of the Old Testament. Can the OT be considered reliable based on this information? No!

New Testament Reliability and Authorship

None of the disciples wrote the Gospel accounts, sadly, many Christian wrongly believe this despite being untrue.

Gospel of Matthew – (80-85 CE) we don’t know who wrote it and it is a compilation of earlier material (proto-Mark and the theoretical Sayings Gospel (Q) and M?). First mention of Matthew writing a Gospel comes around 120 CE despite the Matthew we have being in Greek rather than Hebrew and a non-sayings Gospel

Hebrews was NOT written by Paul despite legend associating it with him.

A problem with the Bible is that it is difficult to ascertain what Jesus said and we did not; the same applies to his actions. There are NO chains of transmission either which further compounds the issue of unreliability as it is second, third hand, fourth hand information.

Does the New Testament contain forgeries (unauthorised insertions)?

The last part of the Gospel Mark (Mark 16:9-20)

Earlier manuscripts show chapter 16 to end at verse 8 but in later manuscripts there is a whole chunk (12 verses) which is added after this. We KNOW this is a later (unauthorised) insertion!

Mark 16:9-20 has been called a later addition to the Gospel of Mark by most New Testament scholars in the past century. The main reason for doubting the authenticity of the ending is that it does not appear in some of the oldest existing witnesses, and it is reported to be absent from many others in ancient times by early writers of the Church. Moreover, the ending has some stylistic features which also suggest that it came from another hand. The Gospel is obviously incomplete without these verses, and so most scholars believe that the final leaf of the original manuscript was lost, and that the ending which appears in English versions today (verses 9-20) was supplied during the second century. [ BibleResearcher]

Even the internal evidence militates against this addition:

The internal evidence for the shorter ending (2) is decidedly against its being genuine. Besides containing a high percentage of non-Markan words, its rhetorical tone differs totally from the simple style of Mark's Gospel. [Bruce Metzger, A Textual Commentary on the Greek New Testament (Stuttgart, 1971), pages 122-126.]

More info:
http://www.bible-researcher.com/endmark.html

The story of the adulteress in John (John 1:53 – 8:11)

It does NOT exist in the earliest manuscripts we have; (the ENTIRE section does not exist). Further explanation: Biblical scholars are nearly all agreed that the Story of the Adulteress (also known as the Pericope Adulterae or the Pericope de Adultera) usually printed in Bibles as John 7:53-8:11 is a later addition to the Gospel. [BibleResearcher.com]

American Standard Version (1901). Marginal note: "Most of the ancient authorities omit John vii. 53--viii. 11. Those which contain it vary much from each other."

If the story of the adulteress was an ancient story about Jesus, why did it not immediately become part of the accepted Gospels? Riesenfeld has given the most plausible explanation of the delay in the acceptance of this story. The ease with which Jesus forgave the adulteress was hard to reconcile with the stern penitential discipline in vogue in the early Church. It was only when a more liberal penitential practice was firmly established that this story received wide acceptance. (Riesenfeld traces its liturgical acceptance to the fifth century as a reading for the feast of St. Pelagia.) [Raymond E. Brown, The Gospel According to John (i-xii), in the Anchor Bible series (Garden City, New York: Doubleday, 1966), pages 335-6.]

This clearly shows there was a CULTURE of scribal addition which imputes tangible suspicion upon the whole of the New Testament.

More info on this scribal addition:
http://www.bible-researcher.com/adult.html

Dr Jerald Dirks has presented sufficient material to do away with the doctrinal view of Biblical inerrancy.

Christians; become familiar with your own scripture. Study carefully.

"'How can you say, "We are wise, for we have the law of the LORD," when actually the lying pen of the scribes has handled it falsely? (NIV Jeremiah 8:8)

God willing your studies will lead you to Islam

Then you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free." (NIV, John 8:32)

Are they then unaware that Allah knoweth that which they keep hidden and that which they proclaim? (77) Among them are unlettered folk who know the Scripture not except from hearsay. They but guess. (78) Therefore woe be unto those who write the Scripture with their hands and then say, "This is from Allah," that they may purchase a small gain therewith. Woe unto them for that their hands have written, and woe unto them for that they earn thereby. (79) [Pikthal translation of the Holy Quran, 2:77-79]

Saturday, November 13, 2010

Friday, November 12, 2010

Kenyan Flight Attendant found Islam

Be advised that there is music in the background.
An amazing story of how Islam found a Christian woman who thought she had it all.
Why would women run towards Islam, if Islam is oppressing? Why would women run towards Islam is Islam does not give them hope, love, life? Why would someone give up being uncovered, being so called free, go where ever they want, do whatever they want, eat what ever they want, sleep when they want, not wake up early and pray, not fast not do anything that is structured? WHY WHY WHY?
You need to find out why? You owe it to yourself as a Christian or any other faith to find out why.

Tuesday, November 9, 2010

Muslims Warned Against Acts 17 Apologetics' David Wood (on ABN sat)

I live in the UK and I can assure you most Christians I have met have been sincere. However, the ineternet is awash with fundamentalist "Christians" who very much appear to be unchristian.

Many, if not all, of these fundamentalist internet "Christians" bash Islam on a regular basis; using varied methodologies.

David Wood, on ABN, uses the methodology of passing off fabrications, hoaxes and lies as fact. Here David Wood is caught presenting a googled hoax to demonise Muslims. Sad but true.

Muslims, be alert to this tactic and ask your local scholars with regards to anything you are unsure about. Don't be fooled.



Spot the spelling mistake

If you are struggling to read the text in time, please pause and read the text before moving on. Did David Wood really expect us to believe he was keeping this a secret because he "does not like talking about it"?

May Allah protect us from deception. Ameen.

Is Shamoun that brave?

Sam Shamoun is not unknown to the debate community on the net, especially when his ways of dealing with his opponents are not very clean. Recently he has been outdoing himself by insulting Yahya, myself and others such as Shabir Ali and Sami.

Sam claims that we are scared to debate him, but he fails to mention that we are debating him, however not in the way he wants. So since he does not get his way, he will not miss any opportunity to insult us and to challenge us thinking that we might give in.

For those who might wonder why do we refuse to debate him on a face to face or live basis, as debates usually are that way, let me tell you that you might want to realize that the topics that we are discussing are very sensitive and cannot sometimes be given justice in a debate face to face. Why?

Well first and foremost debates are not always based on truth but rather the debate skills of the ones presenting. I have admitted many times that Shamoun is a very good debater however that does not mean he is speaking the truth or that the truth is on his side. That has to be taken into consideration by a good debater before he engages his opponent. That is exactly what I have done. I did not refuse to debate him, as I will always do that, insh Allah till the day I die I will keep refuting the lies and misconceptions that people such as Sam keep propagating in the world, however to each person I might take a different approach based on calculated and educated choices.

What am I scared of? I can tell you that it's not Sam or any person in this world, it is God that I am scared of. So did I run, did I ever run, did I ever act cowardly? No NO NO NO NO NO. Sam would like you to think that and he keeps saying that about Yahya as well, but that is only because we are killing him softly with our words, our refutations and our arguments which are researched well, which have a time factor that could not be possible in a face to face debate, and which allow our audience to realize the tricks that Shamoun would be able to pull in a face to face debate, but cannot in a debate where the opponent has time to research and investigate all the allegations put forth.

Given the above Sam is boiling inside and the only thing he can do is try his hardest to upset us, to insult us, in order to get us to finally break and say FINE WE'LL DO IT FACE TO FACE. I want to make a note here. This does not mean we or I will never debate Shamoun under a different format but for now this format is the best, as it allows the MUSLIM side to show the audience the flaws of the arguments, replay the information given by Shamoun and expose the flaws one by one, while correcting them and giving people the proper information. At the same time the inconsistency and double standards of Shamoun are shown. There might be a time when I will debate Sam in a different format, maybe one day when he can control his emotions, his hatred and his mouth. We might feel that in the future an intellectual debate is possible, however since intellectual debates entitle clean speech we might have to wait a bit for Sam to mature.

Till then we are and we will keep debating him, but in the format of YOU MAKE A VIDEO I RESPOND, THEN YOU RESPOND, THEN I RESPOND allowing our audiences to be able to go beyond just witnessing a spectacle of words, and debate skills to a state where they can actually digest the information, check the claims and confirm the truth themselves as GOD GAVE THEM A MIND ALSO AND NOT ONLY TO SAM.

In conclusion, when Shamoun keeps complaining and accusing us of not wanting to debate him, that is not true. We are debating him, and everyone on youtube can see it, as they have, it's only that we are not doing it the way he wants which causes a big problem for him and his folk, who are being exposed for the lies they are spreading about ISLAM, loosing audiences every day, and actually allowing Muslims and non Muslims to see the truth of the argument and choose ISLAM as their way of life, as it was the way of life of Jesus and all the prophets from before.

Monday, November 8, 2010

Jesus on The Life of this World

One of the most amazing stories about the deception of the life of this world, told to us by Jesus peace be upon him.
Jesus is one of the most beloved prophets in Islam, a figure to imitate and follow, a man who was one of the best worshipers, who divorced this world and followed God, preaching to people that they should repent as the Kingdom of God is near.

Sunday, November 7, 2010

So who is debating me?

For those following up with my discussion with Shamoun, and are confused as to why I am debating Keith Truth, let me tell you: you are not the only one who is confused. I mean I let it go for some time but now it's getting ridiculous and I want an answer from Shamoun's mouth as to why it's not him debating but Keith. Of course I received all the so called explanations that Sam is actually providing the material and Keith is just putting it together, but if you have followed up with the exchange you will realize that it does not seem as such as Keith seems to have much of the debate filled with his own ideas and understanding.

The excuse that I have been given is that Sam is not that technologically apt and therefore Keith is the one who posts the videos to help Sam. But that is very hard to believe, as Shamoun is a MAC operator as you can see him on his Jesus or Muhammad Show, as well as very familiar with Paltalk and other programs. Earlier this year I have even uploaded a program helping him post his own videos of a Mac computer which we both own, which is very easy to be done. However nothing happened. Fine, let's give him the benefit of the doubt and say he does not know how to make videos. Can he at least record his voice and send it to Keith and let him do the editing from there? I think that's not much to ask.

So what is the real deal, and why has he been debating through a proxy? One can only conclude, that it is due to the fact that he knows that he is getting involved in a debate that gives his opponent the ability to avoid his face to face debate tactics and tricks, the audience can investigate the proofs and take enough time to look at both sides, and not only be impressed by debate skills. So his usual tricks don't work, and he knows that he can play it safe by outsourcing where he can always say WELL IT WAS NOT ME DEBATING REALLY, IT WAS SOMEONE ELSE. I DID NOT THINK YOU ARE WORTH IT.

Let your minds wonder as mine is still wondering as to why Shamoun is not man enough to learn how to put a youtube video together and come forth so we can hear his voice and arguments.

We'll leave the lights on for him.

Saturday, October 23, 2010

The Consequences of the Sahadah by Essam Tawfik

Muslims Helped Jews Against Nazis

Muslims Saved Jews From Nazis

Some Islamophobes try to portray Muslims as Nazis; this is far from the case. In fact there are a number of heart-warming stories of Muslims coming to the aid of Jews during Nazi occupations. Sadly, these stories are buried under right-wing (anti-Muslim) propaganda.

Recently I received a link to a CNN report of Albanian Muslims supporting the Jews against the Nazis; I was unaware of such Muslim heroism in Albania, I was aware of Muslims in North Africa coming to the aid of Jews during the second World War – hence I did some digging around and came across Robert Saltoff’s work. He describes the story of a mayor in Tunisia giving refuge to sixty (60) Jewish escapees (from slave labour camps) and thus saving them from Nazi design. Saltoff also tells the story of Khaled Abdul-Wahhaab, who saved a Jewish girl from Nazi rape.

New exhibition tells of how Albanian Muslims risked their lives to save Jewish people – the rabbi states the Albanian Muslims did this out of religious obligation – food for thought for the Islamophobes who want to demonise Muslims



With rising anti-Muslim sentiment across the country, an untold story is raising greater awareness about the Muslim faith and the teachings of the Quran. That awareness comes from an unlikely source: a small Jewish congregation in Creve Coeur. (From CNN's blog)

A clip of Robert Saltoff telling the story of Muslim heroes helping Jews during Nazi occupation



Complete video at: http://fora.tv/2006/11/19/Among_the_R...

Author and Middle East policy expert Robert Satloff duscusses several stories of assistance North African Arabs offered to Jews during the Holocaust.

Robert Satloff talks about "Among the Righteous."

Satloff revisits the Holocaust to document the role that Arabs played in saving Jews, as a way of helping to bridge the divide among Arabs and Jews. Satloff, director of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, calls his book "part history, part travelogue, part memoir" - Politics & Prose


Thursday, October 21, 2010

The Right of the Nafs Jumah Khutbah

Sunday, October 17, 2010

Yahya Snow takes a look at Sam vs Jibreelk

Sam Shamoun's Demons Vs Jibreelk (Debate)
Recently we brought you insight into Sam Shamoun’s racist past – Shamoun was a black supremacist who hated white people. It was suggested Shamoun’s disaffected youth has shaped his actions on the internet and lead him to transfer his hatred away from a particular race of people and redirect such venom at a religious group (Muslims). Sad, but true...Shamoun has never removed his shackles of hate nor has he managed to beat the demons which blighted his youth.

Sam Shamoun has unleashed another bout of his nastiness and rebelliion, which permeates deep within his being, at a Muslim named Jibreelk. Jibreelk is a kind hearted and well-reputed individual who certainly does not warrant Shamoun’s venom. All I can say is, I’m glad I reside in the UK as I would not feel secure knowing Sam Shamoun was in the same country. Shamoun lives in America, I have no idea if he has transferred his cyber-venom to real life. I personally hope he never visits the UK as there is a growing Muslim population here; a population which is already suffering from discrimination. Sahmoun's comments will be in red.

Here is Shamoun’s latest demonic out-pouring:

ATTENTION JIBREELK THE LIAR. KEITHTRUTH'S LATEST REFUTATIONS OF YOUR IGNORANCE, LIES, AND DECEPTIONS HAS BEEN POSTED: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v¬=i_EDYTTR3gQ

AND DON'T THINK I FORGOT YOU. MY CHALLENGE TO YOU CALLING YOU OUT TO BE MAN ENOUGH TO DO A LIVE DEBATE WITH ME WILL BE COMING OUT. I HAVEN'T RUSHED TO IT BECAUSE YOU ARE REALLY NOTHING. THE ONLY REASON WHY I AM EVEN BOTHERING WITH YOU IS BECAUSE OF YOUR FAT MOUTH WHICH HAS NOW BEEN SHUT TIGHT, THANKS TO KEITH. SEE WHAT HAPPENED TO YOU

For the unaware, Shamoun regularly calls people “liars”; it is his modus operandi. I have been following the exchange between the two and have not noticed any lie on the part of Jibreelk – Shamoun is being more than disingenuous here. Shamoun’s misdirection is his “live debate challenge” – he has been absolutely outflanked in the YouTube debate, thus far. Why he is angling for a live debate is beyond me. In any case, I have recently received another disgusting comment from Shamoun which further excludes him from the validation of a live debate, God willing I will discuss his comment at a later date.

What’s up with the capitals? Shamoun is shouting.
Shamoun accusing people of being mouthy; pot, kettle and black spring to mind. Sam is a guranteed laugh, it really does appear as though Shamoun watches different motion pictures than the rest of us and he winds up with a conclusion which is er,…let’s be kind and just say it is incongruous with reality.

Here he is again working himself up in a frenzy…Sam, calm down…you will do yourself a hernia.

THE DOGS ARE OUT BARKING AGAIN. After having been humiliated and exposed for his intellectual ineptness by both myself and Keith Truth, JibreelK has mustered some courage again after finishing a month of observing a pagan fast in worship of a false god and in celebration of a false prophet who would kiss and smother a lifeless black stone and is wondering when I will respond to his garbage. It seems that illiteracy has become a part of the Sunna that dawagandists like JibreelK have embraced in order to honor their false prophet since JibreelK has been exposed to public shame by Keith Truth in the following videos

Crikey, Sam Shamoun does have a habit of concluding in a fashion which is detached from reality. Again, the dialogue so far has not resulted in any humiliation for Jibreel…all he did was refute Shamoun’s far feteched claims. See here.

The fast is not pagan, it is prescribe by God. Quite how that makes something pagan is beyond me – welcome to the mind of Sam Shamoun. Regarding the black stone, see here.

What in the world is a dawagandist? Sam Shamoun, care to explain?

Again, Shamoun has a habit of trying to convince himself Muhammad (p) is a false prophet. Shamoun has never been able to prove it despite trying for decades! Sam, proof is currency which you lack.

Sam, referring to people as dogs is not going to score you debate points

Sam Shamoun’s “Challenges” are free flowing:

In the meantime, I am going to reissue my challenge to this coward to debate me live on the satelite show I do on www.abnsat.com. I am calling this coward out to defend his "replies" to our arguments and defend the honor of his false prophet, that is if he truly believes that he has really refuted anything we have said and has actually provided a meaningful rebuttal. It is time for this repulsive lying dawagandist to back up his barking with some bite. Please inform him of this post and my challenge.

I guess the fact he is already locked in a YouTube debate with Jibreelk has escaped his mind! Like I say, Sam is a guaranteed laugh. Just in case you are wondering about his “satellite show”, here is the main presenter and his pal claiming Islam “condones” and “encourages” homosexuality. Hardly the most erudite and sophisticated of shows!

Message to Christians and others on the internet

Please, people stop supporting charlatans such as Sam Shamoun, financially and in any other capacity. Shamoun uses his "Christian" faith as a vehicle for hate, he uses it as a false guise to bash Muslims. Previously he was racist against white people; now he is targeting Muslims with his hatred. This man is clearly anti-Jesus (p), whilst the Muslim gentleman is pro-Jesus (p).

Here we have a classic case of good Vs bad. I think we can see which side each individual belongs on.

I invite all to research Islam, go to your local Islamic centre, read a translation of the Quran, befriend pious Muslims and ask questions whilst praying to God to guide you to the Truth.

Feedback: yahyasnow@hotmail.comSam Shamoun's Demons Vs Jibreelk (Debate)
Recently we brought you insight into Sam Shamoun’s racist past – Shamoun was a black supremacist who hated white people. It was suggested Shamoun’s disaffected youth has shaped his actions on the internet and lead him to transfer his hatred away from a particular race of people and redirect such venom at a religious group (Muslims). Sad, but true...Shamoun has never removed his shackles of hate nor has he managed to beat the demons which blighted his youth.

Sam Shamoun has unleashed another bout of his nastiness and rebelliion, which permeates deep within his being, at a Muslim named Jibreelk. Jibreelk is a kind hearted and well-reputed individual who certainly does not warrant Shamoun’s venom. All I can say is, I’m glad I reside in the UK as I would not feel secure knowing Sam Shamoun was in the same country. Shamoun lives in America, I have no idea if he has transferred his cyber-venom to real life. I personally hope he never visits the UK as there is a growing Muslim population here; a population which is already suffering from discrimination. Sahmoun's comments will be in red.

Here is Shamoun’s latest demonic out-pouring:

ATTENTION JIBREELK THE LIAR. KEITHTRUTH'S LATEST REFUTATIONS OF YOUR IGNORANCE, LIES, AND DECEPTIONS HAS BEEN POSTED: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v¬=i_EDYTTR3gQ

AND DON'T THINK I FORGOT YOU. MY CHALLENGE TO YOU CALLING YOU OUT TO BE MAN ENOUGH TO DO A LIVE DEBATE WITH ME WILL BE COMING OUT. I HAVEN'T RUSHED TO IT BECAUSE YOU ARE REALLY NOTHING. THE ONLY REASON WHY I AM EVEN BOTHERING WITH YOU IS BECAUSE OF YOUR FAT MOUTH WHICH HAS NOW BEEN SHUT TIGHT, THANKS TO KEITH. SEE WHAT HAPPENED TO YOU

For the unaware, Shamoun regularly calls people “liars”; it is his modus operandi. I have been following the exchange between the two and have not noticed any lie on the part of Jibreelk – Shamoun is being more than disingenuous here. Shamoun’s misdirection is his “live debate challenge” – he has been absolutely outflanked in the YouTube debate, thus far. Why he is angling for a live debate is beyond me. In any case, I have recently received another disgusting comment from Shamoun which further excludes him from the validation of a live debate, God willing I will discuss his comment at a later date.

What’s up with the capitals? Shamoun is shouting.
Shamoun accusing people of being mouthy; pot, kettle and black spring to mind. Sam is a guranteed laugh, it really does appear as though Shamoun watches different motion pictures than the rest of us and he winds up with a conclusion which is er,…let’s be kind and just say it is incongruous with reality.

Here he is again working himself up in a frenzy…Sam, calm down…you will do yourself a hernia.

THE DOGS ARE OUT BARKING AGAIN. After having been humiliated and exposed for his intellectual ineptness by both myself and Keith Truth, JibreelK has mustered some courage again after finishing a month of observing a pagan fast in worship of a false god and in celebration of a false prophet who would kiss and smother a lifeless black stone and is wondering when I will respond to his garbage. It seems that illiteracy has become a part of the Sunna that dawagandists like JibreelK have embraced in order to honor their false prophet since JibreelK has been exposed to public shame by Keith Truth in the following videos

Crikey, Sam Shamoun does have a habit of concluding in a fashion which is detached from reality. Again, the dialogue so far has not resulted in any humiliation for Jibreel…all he did was refute Shamoun’s far feteched claims. See here.

The fast is not pagan, it is prescribe by God. Quite how that makes something pagan is beyond me – welcome to the mind of Sam Shamoun. Regarding the black stone, see here.

What in the world is a dawagandist? Sam Shamoun, care to explain?

Again, Shamoun has a habit of trying to convince himself Muhammad (p) is a false prophet. Shamoun has never been able to prove it despite trying for decades! Sam, proof is currency which you lack.

Sam, referring to people as dogs is not going to score you debate points

Sam Shamoun’s “Challenges” are free flowing:

In the meantime, I am going to reissue my challenge to this coward to debate me live on the satelite show I do on www.abnsat.com. I am calling this coward out to defend his "replies" to our arguments and defend the honor of his false prophet, that is if he truly believes that he has really refuted anything we have said and has actually provided a meaningful rebuttal. It is time for this repulsive lying dawagandist to back up his barking with some bite. Please inform him of this post and my challenge.

I guess the fact he is already locked in a YouTube debate with Jibreelk has escaped his mind! Like I say, Sam is a guaranteed laugh. Just in case you are wondering about his “satellite show”, here is the main presenter and his pal claiming Islam “condones” and “encourages” homosexuality. Hardly the most erudite and sophisticated of shows!

Message to Christians and others on the internet

Please, people stop supporting charlatans such as Sam Shamoun, financially and in any other capacity. Shamoun uses his "Christian" faith as a vehicle for hate, he uses it as a false guise to bash Muslims. Previously he was racist against white people; now he is targeting Muslims with his hatred. This man is clearly anti-Jesus (p), whilst the Muslim gentleman is pro-Jesus (p).

Here we have a classic case of good Vs bad. I think we can see which side each individual belongs on.

I invite all to research Islam, go to your local Islamic centre, read a translation of the Quran, befriend pious Muslims and ask questions whilst praying to God to guide you to the Truth.

Feedback: yahyasnow@hotmail.com

Monday, October 11, 2010

Quran as Divine Speech

What is your impression of Quran as Divine Speech?

by Nouman Ali Khan


Saturday, October 9, 2010

Does Walid Shoebat's Eschatological Claim Make Sense?

Sadly some fundamentalist Christians really really want Islam and Muslims to be the "mark of the beast".

Thursday, October 7, 2010

Misconceptions about Quran

Is lack of understanding of Arabic Language contributing to various misunderstandings about the Quran?



Sunday, October 3, 2010

Why was Quran Revealed in Arabic?

Why was Quran Revealed in Arabic and Not in Any Other Language?


Friday, October 1, 2010

Bye Bye Ramadan?

Will we follow them in the hole?

Thursday, September 30, 2010

Lies about Muhammad

Assalamo Aleikum wrb
It is a pleasure to announce that Shaikh Mustapha Zayed has finished his book entitled "Lies about Muhammad", responding to the infamous Robert Spencer the author of "The Truth About Muhammad".
In the following clip he is being interviewed by Eddie from the Deen Show on the content of his new book, and why he decided to write it.

To purchase a copy of the book, please visit
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Lies-about-Muhammad-Moustafa-Zayed/dp/1453618155

Sunday, September 26, 2010

Forgiveness: Muslim + Christian Views

Effectively, Christians believe God transferred the sin of mankind upon (a person of) Himself and had Himself killed at the hands of a bunch of Jews and Romans in order to forgive sin. On the other hand Muslims believe God simply forgives sin out of His Mercy without a need to kill Himself.

The Muslim view does in fact make more sense once an individual considers the Attributes of God and the history of sin.

The History of Sin

Does sin have a point of inception? It does. The concept of sin only came into existence due to God. Think about it; an individual down the road who happens to have sexual intercourse is commiting sin because he is doing this act in an unmarried state whilst the individual next door is doing the SAME act but not committing a sin as his actions are under the umbrella of marriage. Who set the criteria of what constitutes sin and what does not? God.

So Who brought the concept of sin into existence? God.

Did God kill Himself in order to bring the idea of sin into existence? No.

Think about it, if God can introduce the idea of sin without a need to kill Himself then surely you can believe God can forgive people without sacrificing Himself.

NOTE: For intellectual honesty purposes it must be stated there is a distinction between the idea of sin and the act of sin.

Attributes of God

The relevant attributes of God for the purposes of this article are:

*God being the Ever Living
*God being the Forgiver

We realise God does not die and is the Forgiver of sin; therefore the Christian belief of God dying for the sin of people is problematic but the Islamic belief of God forgiving without dying is in line with a consistent and correct view of God

So, do we need God to sacrifice Himself in order to forgive sinners? No. The Islamic view of God simply forgiving out of His Mercy is sufficient.

All this philosophising does throw further refutation upon the neo-Christian idea of atonement

New Low: "Christian" Islamophobes Make Homosexuality Claim Against Islam

Here we have it folks. Pastor Joseph and Brother Hamoudy claiming Islam allows and even encourages homosexuality!

This, of course, is blatantly untrue; these two Christians on the 'News and Views' show (via the Aramaic Broadcasting Network)) were obviously wrong; everybody and their dog KNOWS Islam does NOT allow homosexuality and is in fact very striclty against the homosexual act.

I guess the axiomatic truth is no obstacle for Pastor Joseph and Brother Hamoudy - these two Christians make it quite apparent they have no regard for accuracy and truth. They are shown to be the charlatans they clearly are in this embarrassing and spectacular video.




The scholars at Islamonline discuss homosexuality:

The Qur’an tells us the story of the people of Lut (Lot), who deviated from the natural way and got involved in this abnormality, refusing every word of advice from their Prophet Lut. Thus, their destiny was destruction and punishment. Almighty Allah says: “And Lo! (Remember) when he said unto his folk: Will ye commit abomination such as no creature ever did before you? Lo! ye come with lust unto men instead of women. Nay, but ye are wanton folk. And the answer of his people was only that they said (one to another): Turn them out of your township. They are folk, forsooth, who keep pure. And We rescued him and his household, save his wife, who was of those who stayed behind. And We rained a rain upon them. See now the nature of the consequence for evil doers!” (Al-A`raf: 80-84)

The eminent Muslim scholar Sheikh Yusuf Al-Qaradawi, states:

“Almighty Allah has prohibited illegal sexual intercourse and homosexuality and all means that lead to either of them. This perverted act is a reversal of the natural order, a corruption of man’s sexuality, and a crime against the rights of females.

Tuesday, September 21, 2010

Sam Shamoun, from Christianity to the Nation of Islam (NOI) !!

I must say that this blew me off my feet. What can I make out of it, except to say that things are making sense now. Sam Shamoun's deep hatred for Islam, his foul languages when engaged in discussions with Muslims, his psychological imbalances that he presents in his debates. As a major of psychology, being fascinated with human thought, feelings/emotions, personality and what influences I must say that things are making sense. I no longer look at Sam Shamoun in a puzzled way for his hatred, his deliberate manipulations and distortions (and more important the fact that he himself believes he is truthful) of Islam.

Sam Shamoun was Nation of Islam for aprox. 4 years and then he reverted back to Christianity. I never knew that and this was never mentioned by him, or by anyone else in any of his introductions or biographies on any of his work. I wonder why? Does he hate Islam so much that he cannot even mention that at one point he was part of at least some kind of offshoot of it?

I do have to be fair and say that I appreciate the fact that at least he does not pull the so often common trick of I WAS A MUSLIM I KNOW ISLAM, I AM AN APOSTATE NOW, I AM A SCHOLAR OF ISLAM. At least he says that Nation of Islam are not considered Muslims, over which there is no disagreement amongst the Ahlul Sunnah wa Jamah, those who follow the prophet Muhammad pbuh.

May Allah guide Sam Shamoun. I am calling for a world wide duaa/prayer for Sam Shamoun from all the Muslims, to ask Alalh the Most High to guide Sam Shamoun, to open his heart and to remove the hatred and replace it with love as it was done before to many people who hated Islam, hated the prophet pbuh, yet they became the ones who loved them the most.

Watch the following video in which Sam admits he was part of Nation of Islam.


a few lives transformed by the Qur'an...

Are there grammatical errors in Quran?

Monday, September 20, 2010

AL ARABIYA: While NY debates its ‘Ground Zero’ mosque, Saudi builds mosque near the North Pole

AL ARABIYA: While NY debates its ‘Ground Zero’ mosque, Saudi builds mosque near the North Pole


A Saudi journalist decided to build a mosque in the extreme north of Canada for Muslims who have for long has a small wooden hut for a place of worship. Its name will be The Mosque at the End of the World.

In 10 days’ time, a mosque will be erected in the Canadian town of Inuvik, 200 kilometers from the North Pole. The northwestern town, with a population of 3,700, is home to 75-80 Muslims, mostly Arabs, who have no place to pray except a mobile hut that can only take half of them.

The town, whose name means ‘place of man’ in Eskimo language, is known for its soaring prices due to its remote location and the time it takes for goods to reach it especially during its freezing winter where the temperatures reaches 40 degrees below zero.

Building a mosque in Inuvik required a minimum of $750,000 as well as a team of experts, which was not available in the town. This is when Saudi journalist Dr. Hussein Saud Qasti came in.

Qasti, who runs a charity organization with his wife in the province of Manitoba, got wind of the frustration of Inuvik’s Muslims and decided to build them a mosque.

He collected donations from several Arabs in different parts of Canada and Iraqi engineer Ahmed al-Khalaf who lives in Inuvik. A Saudi woman, who asked for her name to be withheld, donated $190,000.

The total cost of the mosque is estimated at half a million dollars, that is $250,000 less than the cost estimated by the residents of Inuvik.

Al Arabiya contributed to the details that added to the mosque’s uniqueness when it suggested the name ‘The Mosque at the End of the World’.

Friday, September 17, 2010

FACEBOOK CHALLENGE

An explanation of the history behind our name is posted above the followers box on the right side.  We are asking all the visitors to take our FACEBOOK CHALLENGE and get some blessings from Allah swt.  Let's see who can recommend our site to the most people and FACEBOOK and get the most I LIKE signs on their post.  Just imagine what a contribution you would make to the dawa if you would guide someone through Islam by our work.  You would not have to do the work, all you would have to do is point them to our work and you would get the same reward.  Amazing.  May Allah bless you all for your help.
Just go to face book post a link of www.islamdunktv.com with an attractive comment or maybe one of our posts and send it to all your contacts and friends and get them to press the I LIKE BUTTON, and have them do the same thing, post it on their page and keep the ball rolling.
Jizak Allah.

Friday, September 10, 2010

Eid Mubarak

Takabal Allah minna wa minkum.  Kul amal wa antum bil khair.  Eid Mubarak.
May Allah accept from us and you.  May all things be good and may you be good. Happy Eid from ISLAMDUNK MEDIA PRODUCTIONS.
May Allah bless you with a loving year, a year spend in His obedience and service, in peace, joy and love.

Monday, September 6, 2010

New deadline for competition

IslamDumk has extended the deadline submission for the competition till September 20 th.
Please spread the word and visit www.islamdunktv.com

Sunday, September 5, 2010

James White Rebuked by Muslims

Right, for those who want a quick backdrop as to why Muslims are rebuking James White I will inform you White, in his debate with Sheikh Awal, claimed Allah repents in Surah 2:37 and he (White) was later taken to task on this issue and his odd claim was styled a “lie” as NO translation of the Quran agreed with James White’s assertion. Sheikh Awal was stunned and confused over White’s bizarre proclamation too.

Subsequently James White was harshly rebuked (see here) and criticised for being inconsistent and inaccurate. White responded by claiming he was RIGHT (even though ALL the expert translators of the Verse disagreed with him). White cited a bloke from a missionary website as proof he was RIGHT and thus all the EXPERTS WERE WRONG!!! See Appendix 1 for the article in which James White is adamant he is right (and thus EVERY expert translator is incorrect), evocatively titled as “Facts for the Honest (To Be Ignored by the Dishonest)”

Muslim Apologist, 1MoreMuslim, Gives James White a lesson in Arabic grammar and a Stern Ticking Off

The latest (and final) chapter was an Arabic speaker giving James White a lesson in Arabic grammar and REBUKING James White and confirming what we all KNEW – that James White is in the wrong. It's time for White to come clean and up his level of scholarship. Here is 1MoreMuslim’s rebuke and lesson directed at James White:



Conclusion – White involved himself in inaccurate and inconsistent scholarship

James White shunned ALL expert translations and translators in favour of a bloke on the internet who is NOT qualified in Arabic. Once James White was found out he adamantly insisted he was RIGHT and started accusing those who found him out of dishonesty. James White was left with no hiding place after 1MoreMuslim exposed his dodgy internet translation to be grammatically incorrect.

White KNOWS he cannot just go around eschewing (shunning) expert scholarship and translations in favour of a dodgy missionary translation on the internet as this is inconsistent and intellectually dishonest. White KNOWS this but his pride fails to allow him to admit to his error.
James White is being inconsistent. To paraphrase James White; inconsistency is the sign of a failed argument and a failed faith too.

If White deceived you with his helping of inaccuracy please contact him and let him know of your disapproval.

May God guide us all and may God bless those who took part in bringing James White’s misinformation, inconsistency and unreliability to the fore. Ameen.

Contact the author of this piece: yahyasnow@hotmail.com

Appendix 1

James White’s fallacious article in its entirety (increase screen size to read it comfortably):

Facts for the Honest (To Be Ignored by the Dishonest)
06/25/2010 - James White
For the few who are interested in the brief statement I made (styled a "lie" by the PPO&D, the "promoters of perpetual outrage and dishonesty"---a new term I have quoted for a certain very small, very irrelevant, but very vocal group of Muslim trouble-makers) at one point in the debate with Sheikh Awal, pointing out the contradiction between his asserting the Bible cannot be the Word of God because God "repents" (the Hebrew is nacham) and the fact that Allah is described as "oft-repenting." I made reference to Surah 2:37 simply because it was the first in a long list of substantiating texts. It says: "Then Adam received commandments from his Lord, and his Lord repented (fataba) towards him; for He is Oft-Repenting (huwa al-tawwabu), Most Merciful." He is oft-repenting. What's so difficult to understand? Well, it's simple: Muslims, as I demonstrated over and over again a few days ago, have one standard for the Bible, another standard for the Qur'an. "Oh, well, in the Qur'an, that means..." and off they go. But, if you attempt to explain that nacham likewise has a contextual meaning in the Bible, they ignore your explanation. So, the Qur'an can be explained, the Bible cannot. Double standards. Inconsistency. Sign of a failed argument, and in this case, a failed religion.

Want to read more? The Assyrian Encyclopedia (I evidently am in the name-creating mood this evening), Sam Shamoun, has laid it out clearly here. Read. Learn.


Find 1MoreMuslim here:
http://www.youtube.com/user/1MoreMuslim

Click and Order Today

 
IslamDunkTV © 2010 Design by New WP Themes | Bloggerized by Lasantha - Premiumbloggertemplates.com
Powered by Blogger